THOUSANDS OF FREE BLOGGER TEMPLATES

Who is your favorite DBSK member?

いらっしゃい! Welcome !

これから、Facebookアップデートをブログよりに更新されます!
お楽しみに。。(>3<)/”/

君のコメントは待ってるよ!それを感謝します。。(^^)/

最後に,すべてためのは本当にありがとうございます!!^^

日本サイト:http://ameblo.jp/tvxqredletters


From now on,Facebook updates will be updated in blog!!
Enjoy...!!

We will wait for your comment here! It will be welcomed!!

Finally,we really really thanks for this all!!!

Japan site : http://ameblo.jp/tvxqredletters


(You can post your shout out in the right box of our blog.....After see our blog please leave comment inside the blog...Thank you...:)

TVXQ Facebook

Tuesday, 29 June 2010

[Info] 100627 TVXQ [SM,paid 10 billoin won for each person] The idea of the lawsuit institution

When it was three members of TVXQ [jejung] (hero), and [yuchon] (Mickey) and [junsu] (XiaH) were "Provide a part of earnings like the album sales etc.", the SM entertainment was brought, and it took as an opponent and the lawsuit was brought. According to a central district court in Seoul, they instituted the lawsuit , saying that "Provide about partially 10 billion won of earnings for an exclusive contract to make duration of policy 13 invalidly respectively" on the 28th.

They : through the petition. 「SM is insisted on that duration of policy of 13 years is necessary for the overseas presence, and ten years or less for other groups that overseas advance. This proves duration of policy as long as the insistence of SM to be not necessary for the overseas presence. 」It insisted. On the other hand, they demanded "Exclusive contract effect stop" last July, and submitted the provisional deposition to the court.

50 Seoul central district court civil affairs conferences took the SM entertainment as an opponent by three members and accepted a part of caused provisional disposition of the exclusive contract effect stop application ..east god.. causing of [yuchon] (Micky) and [junsu] (Xiah) [jejung] (hero) in October of the same year. The SM side took the place of the member, and the court concluded the public entertainments activity of performance etc. contract, and judged their original activities for it not to able to institute the objection the recognition of an exclusive contract that the SM side had concluded the east god with ..causing.. member of an unfair contract it. However, the judgment of the earnings distribution problem assumed the area of this idea lawsuit and drew the line.


Source :  Japan Site
translated by : TVXQ_REDLETTERS
DO NOT REMOVE OR ADD ON CREDITS

0 comments: